Token
Member
That list is horribly out of date, at least for Yaesu. Perhaps that's just as well as we shouldn't be encouraging modifying radios for out-of-band transmit.
That is a very US centric view point.
Other nations do not necessarily have the same regulations as the US does with regards to certified equipment. Other nations do not necessarily have the same allocations for ham bands as the US does.
What I am saying is that what might be out of band or illegal in the US may not be in other locations. International radio manufacturers would probably like to make a minimum number of variations to simplify the production process and maximize profit. To design radios for ONLY the US market would probably drive up the cost of gear to people in the US. Radios that are easily modified for operation outside the ham bands might be more salable in some nations than ones rigidly fixed to only ham bands.
On top of all of that, it is NOT up to the radio gear to be legal, it is up to the amateur operator to be legal. That is why our gear sold in the US (with a few exceptions) does not have to be certificated for Part 97 use. Prior to CPU driven radios ALL ham radio gear was capable of operation outside the ham bands as delivered from the maker, and it was up to you the operator to know what you could or could not do, and to develop good operating practices so that you were legal.
T!