- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 895
A detachable face for remote mounting would've made this scanner a 10 out of 10 for me. I can't understand why such a simple option like this could not have been incorporated into the design. Nearly every decent amateur radio for mobile use and commercial mobile radios are designed like this.
Here in the lovely state of NJ the police just love hammering folks for distracted driving. Using a smartphone or tablet while driving to control a scanner most certainly qualifies for this and would earn the driver a $300.00 ticket. A remote radio head can be mounted and operated more inconspicously. Sure this can be distracted driving also but it would not be as obvious as using a smartphone or tablet. For an amateur radio operator in NJ it would be perfectly legal to operate the remote head control. If the smartphone and tablet is Unidens suggestion/solution for remote mounting it is very irresponsible. In fact it's against the law in most states.
In NJ amateur radio operators have an exemption in the law to operate their equipment and other states probably have similar exemptions. I can guarantee that the exemption would not cover using a smart phone or tablet to control your scanner.
Other than that I like what I see. Hopefully thay bumped up the audio output power on the external speaker. Its been lacking on the 996XT model and previous models to that.
The best I can tell the 536 is 8 ohms @ 5 watts, the HP-1 is 8 ohms @ 2 watts, 996T is 8 ohms @ 2.6 watts but it has nominal after it and all the others have (Max) for audio out. You might compare your 996XT audio output to these other radios.
Unfortunately this same switching of units happens with the scan rate, namely both of the new radios have 85 channels per second (nominal) and the HP-1 has 100 channels per second (Max).
Hope this helps.