I monitored this on the calls platform. Is that thing not accurate for Ohio? Unknown/Unknown Group Calls LiveOn MARCS? I don’t know about that.
I monitored this on the calls platform. Is that thing not accurate for Ohio? Unknown/Unknown Group Calls LiveOn MARCS? I don’t know about that.
I monitored this on the calls platform. Is that thing not accurate for Ohio? Unknown/Unknown Group Calls Live
I did wonder why the majority of the database showed 5000 and up. Thanks!It isn't. There is a particular BCFY Calls provider who is, against the rules, feeding another trunked system's data into the Ohio MARCS feed when in fact those talkgroups should be sent over a separate BCFY Calls session to another calls node for the county system. Been doing that for probably half a year. I messaged him about it but he basically told me to go pound salt.
Those 135/137 calls should be (and may be) going to this system:
![]()
Shelby County P25 Trunking System, Various, Ohio
Shelby County P25 Trunking System Profilewww.radioreference.com
We definitely should not be seeing them injected into the Ohio MARCS system
Specifically, it's coming from the Celina MARCS node:I did wonder why the majority of the database showed 5000 and up. Thanks!
Sounds like fire/ems ops.
135 - Shelby County "TAC-1"
137 - Shelby County "TAC-3"
It's since been figured out.Apparently, you are all confused.
These are not on MARCS and does not belong in this discussion thread.
These are talkgroups for the Shelby County P25 system, and I added
137 from a submission by the Shelby County Frequency Acquisition Team (SCFAT) on Tuesday
Apparently, you are all confused.
These are not on MARCS and does not belong in this discussion thread.
These are talkgroups for the Shelby County P25 system, and I added
137 from a submission by the Shelby County Frequency Acquisition Team (SCFAT) on Tuesday
I picked up Talkgroup 26035 and heard some speech:
"19-07 to county, be on scene" "19-07 on scene 11:47" "19-20 to county on FD1, We're going to be using MARCS" "You're clear".
So, this is some sort of Fire-ops for the Jackson County area maybe? Or dispatch? However, there's already a talkgroup - 26025 listed as Fire Dispatch in the county. I know 26025 is a legitimate talkgroup because I've heard them before, but would that be Wellston Fire perhaps? Could this 26035 talkgroup be Jackson City's Fire Department? Maybe vise versa.
According to the wiki, 1900 is wellston fire. So 19-07 and 19-20 would be Wellston fire units. I don't know if Wellston Fire is self-dispatched or dispatched by the county, but my gut feeling says they are dispatched by the county. So when they say "19-20 to County" they aren't necessarily suggesting for sure that it's a county talkgroup, but rather they are requesting a response from County (who is likely who dispatches them). So it could be a Wellston Fire TG, or a County Ops TG. Who knows. And are you positive that 26025 is Fire Dispatch ?
![]()
Jackson County (OH) - The RadioReference Wiki
wiki.radioreference.com
Fortunately you are in a good position to be the one to figure out all of these Jackson talkgroups.
Mike
As far as 26025 goes, I can't say for certain that it's Fire Dispatch. I've never heard them talk. I just noticed it was added to the MARCs-IP page a week or so ago so I added it to DSD. Rdio-Scanner hasn't recorded it either. But as I said, Jackson and Wellston cities both are in the same predicament with a lack of funds, or at least I thought so.
Oohh right, I apologize, I'm an idiot and terrible at this lol. I completely forgotten about that. But yeah, 26025, I definitely heard XO40Fire. Rdio-Scanner didn't record it (Thinking I had it disabled in that moment.) and I haven't heard them speak since that day.26025 was added because you submitted it and I worked the submission. Remember, we weren't necessarily positive it was Fire Dispatch, based upon you saying that you heard them call it "XO40FIRE". I said I'd put it in as Fire Dispatch for the time being, but it might change depending upon what is heard in the future.
Mike
The issue was that the person who questioned those talkgroups heard them on the MARCS BCFY Calls platform. And he actually did hear them there. Those talkgroups do not belong there. Whomever provides the Celina MARCS BCFY Calls feed is also injecting Shelby co P25 talkgroups into the same BCFY Calls feed -- and thus Shelby Co talkgroups are showing up (and have been for quite a while) on the MARCS BCFY Calls.
Mike
MARCS coverage is still spotty in certain places due to local topography.
I wonder what the plan would be for getting better coverage. I do know the Indian Camp site isn't a great spot to begin with, there's a lot of topography just in the location where it's currently at. I wonder if they'd try making the Indian Camp tower taller, or maybe it would be easier just to add more sites around the city to increase coverage in problem areas. Either way, all of that costs money, but I imagine that the state of Ohio should be able to help out.
On top of that, Jackson County would have to foot a significant part of the bill for additional sites and/or site upgrades.The Indian Camp site is an old Western Union installation with the two towers side-by-side and bolted together at the top to hold microwave dishes. The MARCS antennas are mounted on the side of the tower facing AWAY from Wellston. This effectively makes the metal tower a reflector that prevents reception and transmission to and from the Wellston area. Moving the antennas to the other side of the tower may create the same problem toward Wilkesville and rural Meigs County. I'm not sure why the antennas weren't placed at the top of the tower. That would give more height and eliminate directional issues. Maybe the top wasn't available. Maybe the MARCS Gods thought Wellston could be covered by towers in Jackson or McArthur. Indian Camp is 6 air miles from downtown Wellston. There is no usable MARCS portable coverage inside any of the school buildings, the city building, the police station, and much of the downtown. 700 MHz mobile repeaters were installed in the cruisers and that helps when the officer is away from the car, but not if the officer is driving and cannot access the MARCS network on the mobile radio. The best solution is a MARCS tower in Wellston. There are a number of good hilltop sites owned by the city or the school district that could be used but there is an expense in building the tower and installing radio equipment. Right now, the 453.675 MHz repeater on Cherrington Ridge covers the city like a warm blanket. It may be the permanent solution for police dispatching if adequate MARCS coverage cannot be obtained. We will see.