2018 VHF Low Band Logs

Status
Not open for further replies.

marvinsuggs

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
739
Location
Richmond, TX
Thank u very much Tom I'll try again this weekend on the 33 mix band. I may need a discone antenna. I'm using a 2m j pole now.
 

jason51

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
145
Location
Dallas
It’s a Diamond D130 NJ
I am mostly receiving it 6am-10, noon to about 2, and a bunch overnight.
I just leave it on and record it. I program the channels that are posted on this thread and leave the pl off.I usually don’t search
 

jason51

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
145
Location
Dallas
I am mainly receiving 46.06 appears to be Baltimore county, MN in the 46 band, CHP, and CT in the 33 band.
My discone is about 12 feet off the top of my roof, probably 28 feet off of the ground with LMR 400.
I have heard skip on 46.06 and CHP with just the antenna on back of the 536.
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,402
Location
California
To the best of my knowledge, that propagation map is based on 144 MHz RF (APRS packets) and not 30-80 MHz traffic. If you observe a correlation great, but just be aware of what that resource is basing its map on.
 

mancow

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
6,904
Location
N.E. Kansas
To the best of my knowledge, that propagation map is based on 144 MHz RF (APRS packets) and not 30-80 MHz traffic. If you observe a correlation great, but just be aware of what that resource is basing its map on.

Yes, that map is worthless in regard to lowband.
 

nd5y

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
11,712
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
If it's one of the discones designed for 100 MHz or so it will be usless on low band.
If it's one of the above with a base loaded whip on top it will still suck on low band.
I had them before.
 

jason51

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
145
Location
Dallas
I have had several of the diamond discone antennas. 30-1200mhz rage and have had really good performance on low band with them.
 

marvinsuggs

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
739
Location
Richmond, TX
If it's one of the discones designed for 100 MHz or so it will be usless on low band.
If it's one of the above with a base loaded whip on top it will still suck on low band.
I had them before.

I'm gonna try a 10 meter dipole
 

RichardKramer

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
1,413
Location
Reading, PA
Low Band antennas

I have 2 RS discones on the roof which work well on low band. I had an issue several years ago where the center coil separated from the whip and I resoldered it; haven't had any issues since. They have been up for 20 years now with RG8 cable. I also use a 6mtr Ringo for our net on 51 MHz on Sunday evenings. The Ringo will outperform the discone in that particular freq range; but the Ringo has a narrow bandwidth of about 3MHz where the swr is below 2. Outside of 50.8 - 53.8 the discone will outperform the Ringo as the discone's swr is fairly flat, less than 2 across the 30 - 88 MHz range. Even if you cut a 10 or 11 meter antenna for a range of low band freqs, they will outperform a discone in the narrow range (maybe 3 - 5 MHz bandwidth); while outside of those ranges the discone will be the top performer due to its flat swr. If I use the Ringo for SSB comms in the lower 50 MHz range I use an antenna tuner which will then outperform the discone. If your discone with a vertical whip is a poor performer on low band then there may be a cable issue or some short somewhere in the antenna or cable; but I wouldn't say they are poor performers on low band.
Rich
 

GMB951

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
722
Location
Cumberland Co,NC
yep also have one of them i ordered from ebay as well as one I ordered from the copper J-Pole Man it worked very well however being copper a recent hurricane took it down
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top