It is the Rural sites you are not receiving. On a 536 lock out all but the County site and see what you receive.
I did try this before. I received nothing with the 536 set up that way. I think I also saw on the 200 that I was getting Emergycare on the Countywide site sometimes.It is the Rural sites you are not receiving. On a 536 lock out all but the County site and see what you receive.
There are two (logical) sites (aka Cell) in this system: the Countywide (Simulcast) Cell, and the Urban (Simulcast) Cell - I don't think that I've ever expressed otherwise. I'm not sure what you mean by Rural sites. I do understand that SF's reception of the Countywide Cell is predictably marginal because his location is on the fringe coverage contours of several tower sites of Countywide Cell. The good news is that a radio designed to receive the signaling produced by this system (the SDS200) can reliably receive the Countywide site using a set-back antenna, and he can now decode and listen to Countywide TACs - something he was unable to do previously with his 536. I'm curious if SF still has the pronounced garbling of other TGs carried on the Urban cell when using the SDS200. He may have to experiment with different filtering options on the SDS to dial in optimum reception quality - something I do not have with our SDS200s.Yes the TAC talkgroups are only carries on the associated sites. Reception of the Rural sites is very poor in his area. I have been in that area and checked. Even my Unication G3 was at 3 of 4 bars. In spite of what you may think there only TWO sites providing that signal in his area. I have plotted the radiation pattern for all of the surrounding sites. A cheap Yagi would probably help the 536s and the SDS200.
Thanks for all the interesting info. I do have some garbling with the urban cell on the 200, something I didn't really expect. It is better than the 536 though. I haven't tried the filter options yet - not sure what to set them at for a system like this. Can you suggest anything?There are two (logical) sites (aka Cell) in this system: the Countywide (Simulcast) Cell, and the Urban (Simulcast) Cell - I don't think that I've ever expressed otherwise. I'm not sure what you mean by Rural sites. I do understand that SF's reception of the Countywide Cell is predictably marginal because his location is on the fringe coverage contours of several tower sites of Countywide Cell. The good news is that a radio designed to receive the signaling produced by this system (the SDS200) can reliably receive the Countywide site using a set-back antenna, and he can now decode and listen to Countywide TACs - something he was unable to do previously with his 536. I'm curious if SF still has the pronounced garbling of other TGs carried on the Urban cell when using the SDS200. He may have to experiment with different filtering options on the SDS to dial in optimum reception quality - something I do not have with our SDS200s.
A cheap Yagi could potentially help with the Countywide Cell if it could be oriented properly, but it was my understanding that he already tried this approach - maybe not. Similarly, a second Yagi could help with the reception of the Urban Cell in much the same manner, but is probably a bit clumsy. At any rate, it seems unnecessary now.
I cannot suggest any particular filter setting because, one, I don't need them thus have no direct experience, and two, they are highly dependent on location - thus what works well for one user does not work well for another even when monitoring the same system.Thanks for all the interesting info. I do have some garbling with the urban cell on the 200, something I didn't really expect. It is better than the 536 though. I haven't tried the filter options yet - not sure what to set them at for a system like this. Can you suggest anything?
I've only tried various back of set antennas so far, except for a ChannelMaster Monitenna I have installed in my attic. Haven't tried this one with the 200 yet.
That would be a good resource. Look at post #6 where Upman says that setting the filters will be a "trial and error" procedure, meaning what works for one person may not work for another. So get ready to dig in and learn the capabilities of your radio!I found a good discussion on filters here:
SDS200 "filter" settings
i have NO IDEA how these settings work. It seems the default is GLOBAL. Anyone know how the rest of these work and what systems would work better with the other setttings?forums.radioreference.com
The units taking are 909 and 910.TG 401 active today. Doing testing in Northeast by Welch's. Said reception was not great. Anyone know what this is?
The units talking are 909 and 910.
Maybe. Does it affect your SDS200 reception?Anyone else noticing poor reception lately of the whole system? Both my 536's are sometimes scanning past TG's or only picking up parts of transmissions. Seems like something changed in the past week or so. Leaves on trees??
It could be leaves, or they could be working on the system, changing antennas, etc. Maybe both. Or weather. Hard to tell. You'll have to continue monitoring to listen for changes / improvements.SDS does the best. But it seems something got worse. 536's did ok before - now it's just tolerable. I wonder how it is for users of the system?