SDS100/SDS200: Firmware 1.06.00M Public Beta

Status
Not open for further replies.

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
I don't think the people that are ok with the VHF (150-173MH)and UHF (400-500Mhz range) have had anything to compare the SDS-100 to. The SDS-100 is deaf on 476MHZ, I am 10 miles from NYC right now and I do not hear analog 476.5625MHZ which is NYC. A BCD-396XT can hear it.
I am not arguing that on 700 and 800mhz the SDS-100 can sink the other scanners in decode.
I agree with jefm77.
 

jeffm77

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
379
Location
pittsburgh, pa
I see the posts on the uniden Facebook pages about the sds100 problems on vhf/uhf analog channels. There's a lot. So, I'm not the only one. I can put the SDS 100 on a dmr uhf control channel on 472.425 and it hardly decodes it. My 325p2 gets it just fine. Just using stock antennas by the way. Also there is a Pennsylvania state wide VHF P25 system here locally by me and my SDS100 won't pick it up but my 436 gets it just fine. There's something wrong with the vhf/uhf sensitivity. It's disappointing that a$600 radio would have these issues. It reminds me of when they rolled out the 436 the early production ones that had the UHF noise where you cover the battery door with copper tape then they fixed the issue by putting a capacitor on the board.
 

kruser

Well Known Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
5,055
Location
W St Louis Cnty, MO
I see the posts on the uniden Facebook pages about the sds100 problems on vhf/uhf analog channels. There's a lot. So, I'm not the only one. I can put the SDS 100 on a dmr uhf control channel on 472.425 and it hardly decodes it. My 325p2 gets it just fine. Just using stock antennas by the way. Also there is a Pennsylvania state wide VHF P25 system here locally by me and my SDS100 won't pick it up but my 436 gets it just fine. There's something wrong with the vhf/uhf sensitivity. It's disappointing that a$600 radio would have these issues. It reminds me of when they rolled out the 436 the early production ones that had the UHF noise where you cover the battery door with copper tape then they fixed the issue by putting a capacitor on the board.

My SDS100 is wiped out on VHF from VHF paging transmitters nearby.
It appears to be a desense problem as the front end basically shuts down when a VHF paging transmitter comes on the air which is almost always on the air unfortunately.

I'm able to use a notch filter to notch the paging band from 152 to 153 MHz. The only problem, our statewide system also has about 50 or more VHF sites across the state that also have control or voice channels setup on reallocated frequencies in that same 152 to 153 MHz paging band! So a notch filter will cure the desense issues in the SDS100 but it also notches out the very system you are trying to receive. Not an easy problem to fix.
I can lower the main paging signal strength just enough to where the front end or AGC circuit in the SDS100 will work again. This allows me to track and monitor only one nearby P25 statewide site. The other sites I monitor cannot be heard because of the needed notch filter. They are more distant sites which do not have a strong signal.
I don't know what's in the SDS100 front end but rumor has it that it is just a basic cheap TV Tuner.

My x36HP and older x96T and XT models all receive the statewide VHF system very well as the VHF sites are not simulcast. The older models are also not bothered by the strong paging signals either. At least not the Uniden models. Any GRE designed models work about as well as the SDS100 due to their poor or no filtering in their front ends which allows the paging sites as well as FM Broadcast stations to desense their front ends.

The paging sites do not mess with my 7/800 MHz simulcast site reception. The SDS100 does a good job receiving simulcast systems and sites in the 7/800 MHz bands.
I've not bothered with 450 MHz reception as we don't have much there worth monitoring.

In the end, my older models that can suffer from LSM work way better than this new SDS100 does! It's a shame as I really like the display features of the SDS100.
I'm keeping it as I have plenty of stuff to monitor outside of the 152 MHz paging band where the notch filter will not bother.

When troubleshooting this issue, I did a test using analog weather and other VHF signals, both strong and weak signal strengths. To my surprise, those analog signals still make it through pretty well even when the paging sites are on the air. When monitoring VHF analog signals, one can hear a faint hiss from the paging data or signal but it does not shut the front end down. Analog still works. I'm sure the noise I do hear is enough to wipe out cc data though but I was expecting the front end to shut down like it appears to do with digital modes. The RSSI indicator on the SDS100 does not go crazy when monitoring analog VHF signals either which it does when monitoring VHF P25 sites and one or more of the nearby paging transmitters come on the air.

The two VHF statewide sites I'm monitoring produce a RSSI of -68 or -102 dBm, depending on the site, when paging xmitters are not on the air. When one or more VHF paging sites come on the air, the RSSI reading shoots up to -40 or -45 dBm which I think is the highest reading it can reach. That's about equal to standing right next to the SDS100s antenna and transmitting with a portable on the tuned frequency. This wipes out the SDS100.

I'd made another post about this problem, in that post I incorrectly stated the VHF paging sites were also wiping out 7/800 MHz P25 signals.
That was bad info but I could no longer edit my post when I discovered "operator error" was the cause of what seemed like desense in the 7/800 MHz band on the SDS100. My SDS100 works well on 7 or 800 MHz P25 sites when the VHF paging transmitter(s) is/are on the air.

I can replicate the paging signal overload or desense issue using nothing more than a signal generator set to a random VHF frequency (I tested between 150 and 160 MHz) and a small portables antenna on the SGs output jack. It does not take a lot to kill the front end in the SDS100 it seems. Maybe one day I'll run the SG through a range of frequencies and see if I can find a low and high frequency where the signals no longer wipe out the SDS front end.

This firmware update did nothing for my VHF reception problem nor has any firmware version (I tried every version I could find!). The problem exists and it is not firmware dependent. I don't know how much control the Uniden engineers have over the front end or whatever stage is being hammered by the paging signals but hopefully that stage can be altered via firmware. I'm not keeping my fingers crossed though as these problems are usually physical hardware issues that firmware can't fix.
 
Last edited:

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,123
Location
Chicago , IL
I don't think the people that are ok with the VHF (150-173MH)and UHF (400-500Mhz range) have had anything to compare the SDS-100 to.

785D, 796D, 396T, 396XT, 996T, 996XT, 996P2, 436hp, 536hp. I have a pretty good sampling of scanners and have included my desktop/mobile units too. Maybe clarify by stating "I'm having some unknown interference/possible programming issues which is causing my SDS100 to have some selective analog reception issue". To report a scanner is "deaf", would indicate EVERYONE can't hear analog transmissions which is simply not the case. As I reported I'm in Chicago...intermod hell within a half-mile of Midway Airport which is even more intermod hellish! I do have some interference on every handheld I've owned especially the nearer I went to the airport at times. Not enough to call a scanner "deaf", but after the previous firmware update, their was a definite improvement to the analog reception which I can now compare it to it's handheld predecessors.

As I've posted before, instead of complaining here, submit debug files to UPMan and his engineering staff. While the resolution might not be as fast as we all want it to be, it takes time to resolve. This scanner has been out 4 months to the public, and it's much better than any previous scanner yes especially with the simulcast distortion issue. All other digital formats are working very well.
 

jasonhouk

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
883
Location
Marion, Ohio
785D, 796D, 396T, 396XT, 996T, 996XT, 996P2, 436hp, 536hp. I have a pretty good sampling of scanners and have included my desktop/mobile units too. Maybe clarify by stating "I'm having some unknown interference/possible programming issues which is causing my SDS100 to have some selective analog reception issue". To report a scanner is "deaf", would indicate EVERYONE can't hear analog transmissions which is simply not the case. As I reported I'm in Chicago...intermod hell within a half-mile of Midway Airport which is even more intermod hellish! I do have some interference on every handheld I've owned especially the nearer I went to the airport at times. Not enough to call a scanner "deaf", but after the previous firmware update, their was a definite improvement to the analog reception which I can now compare it to it's handheld predecessors.

As I've posted before, instead of complaining here, submit debug files to UPMan and his engineering staff. While the resolution might not be as fast as we all want it to be, it takes time to resolve. This scanner has been out 4 months to the public, and it's much better than any previous scanner yes especially with the simulcast distortion issue. All other digital formats are working very well.

I'll add,

Uploading video to YouTube or other sharing service and linking here on RR of the issue a user is experiencing is very helpful along with said debug files to help pinpoint/determine the actual issue.

Houk
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
SDS100

I see the posts on the uniden Facebook pages about the sds100 problems on vhf/uhf analog channels. There's a lot. So, I'm not the only one. I can put the SDS 100 on a dmr uhf control channel on 472.425 and it hardly decodes it. My 325p2 gets it just fine. Just using stock antennas by the way. Also there is a Pennsylvania state wide VHF P25 system here locally by me and my SDS100 won't pick it up but my 436 gets it just fine. There's something wrong with the vhf/uhf sensitivity. It's disappointing that a$600 radio would have these issues. It reminds me of when they rolled out the 436 the early production ones that had the UHF noise where you cover the battery door with copper tape then they fixed the issue by putting a capacitor on the board.

Exactly Jeff, I had the BCD436HP and it worked just fine on VHF and UHF.
Reason I got the SDS100 is because the BCD-436HP did not do well on the 700mhz Simulcast NJPSIC system.
So ya can't win unless you have two scanners. One for simulcast, one for everything else.
I called Uniden and showed them my issues over the phone with no callback/email, the guy on
the phone when I initially called sounded like he was just "listening to satisfy a body being there".
Perhaps put the thing on ebay and cut my losses?
These things aren't cheap.
 

Badboy536

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
161
Just wish the SDS100 had the Sensitivity of the 436. Here in los angeles the 436 picks up Twice as many LAPD divisions then the sds100. Using the same model antenna on both. The sds100 really needs some Tweaky.
 

bravo14

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,036
Location
Polk County FL
I'm using the new fw. Anyone notice on dmr conv. the audio is not there when it sees tg & uid? It drops here there.
 

WX4JCW

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,408
Location
Stow, Ohio
Just wish the SDS100 had the Sensitivity of the 436. Here in los angeles the 436 picks up Twice as many LAPD divisions then the sds100. Using the same model antenna on both. The sds100 really needs some Tweaky.

I went through LA on Thursday, i was picking up LAPD north of magic mountain, which i could not do on my 536, it was coming in Loud and clear along the 5 and 210 freeways as i headed for Ontario

Digital really isnt the issue with the SDS100, to me it seems to have issues with Analog, LaCo Sheriff came in ok, but had some issues with Blue 8 on La County FD, but the other Countywides were fine

https://youtu.be/pQSpdm8la1Y
 
Last edited:

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,214
Location
The OP
Is it fair to assume that since there is now a v. 1.06 beta, that the previous v.1.05 beta has been promoted to the release version? And available in Sentinel?
 

WX4JCW

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,408
Location
Stow, Ohio
Is it fair to assume that since there is now a v. 1.06 beta, that the previous v.1.05 beta has been promoted to the release version? And available in Sentinel?
not necessarily, there may be a few betas before one is released into the wild
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
DMR

I'm using the new fw. Anyone notice on dmr conv. the audio is not there when it sees tg & uid? It drops here there.

Yes, I have a ham repeater N2DCE 447.225 Montclair NJ I like to listen to in the NYC area that when you search it, it sometimes lands on the frequency and sometimes not. And sometimes it decodes and sometimes it doesn't. And sometimes it goes to DMR and then back out to digital buzz. The signal says -90dbm. I tried a few firmwares even the new one .My radio is at 1.05M now where and 1.01S where I think its best signal and decode.
 

jasonhouk

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
883
Location
Marion, Ohio
Yes, I have a ham repeater N2DCE 447.225 Montclair NJ I like to listen to in the NYC area that when you search it, it sometimes lands on the frequency and sometimes not. And sometimes it decodes and sometimes it doesn't. And sometimes it goes to DMR and then back out to digital buzz. The signal says -90dbm. I tried a few firmwares even the new one .My radio is at 1.05M now where and 1.01S where I think its best signal and decode.
What type of Noise reading is displayed when signal strength is around -90 dBm?

Houk

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
 

RocketNJ

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Pequannock, NJ
That repeater is always hit or miss, even with a Motorola 7550e. I get better results listening to the Passaic County RACES DMR repeater.

Yes, I have a ham repeater N2DCE 447.225 Montclair NJ I like to listen to in the NYC area that when you search it, it sometimes lands on the frequency and sometimes not. And sometimes it decodes and sometimes it doesn't. And sometimes it goes to DMR and then back out to digital buzz. The signal says -90dbm. I tried a few firmwares even the new one .My radio is at 1.05M now where and 1.01S where I think its best signal and decode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top